Articles

Analysis of Subject Competencies Reflected in the Achievement Standards of 2015 Revised Music Curriculum

AUTHOR :
Jihye Kim
INFORMATION:
page. 33~51 / 2019 Vol.48 No.1
e-ISSN 2713-3788
p-ISSN 1229-4179
Received 2018-11-30
Revised 2019-01-12
Accepted 2019-01-25
DOI https://doi.org/10.30775/KMES.48.1.33

ABSTRACT

This study aims to provide insight to the future development of music curriculum by analyzing how the music competencies are reflected in the achievement standards of the 2015 revised music curriculum. Competencies were introduced to education as a concept of general manifestation of knowledge, skill, and attitude that are needed for students to manage successful personal and social life in rapidly changing future society. In Korea, they were proposed in the form of core competencies by the 2015 revised curriculum, and thus it is necessary to discuss the subject competencies that actually consist of the core competencies.Achievement standards in curriculum describe the abilities that students should acquire through the completion of their course learning. As such, it is required to reflect the elements of competencies in the achievement standards to promote the manifestation of music competencies that are suggested by the 2015 revised music curriculum. This study set the analysis framework by dividing music competencies into knowledge, skill, and attitude, based on the definition of competencies and the sub-element-setting criteria of the European Union. The obtained implications after analyzing the achievement standards of the 2015 revised music curriculum are as follows: First, it is necessary to reflect diverse music competencies in the achievement standards.Second, research on the attitude aspects of music competencies is necessary.Third, it is required to describe the skill elements of the achievement standards in more detailed levels.

Keyword :

REFERENCES


  1. 교육부 (2015). 2015 개정 음악과 교육과정. 교육부 고시 제 2015-74호 [별책 12]. 세종: 교육부.
  2. 김선영 (2016). 역량중심 교육과정 구현을 위한 교과 교육과정 성취기준의 진술방식 탐색. 교육연구, 66, 1-28.
  3. 김신영 백순근, 채선희 (1998). 국가 수준의 ‘성취기준 및 평가기준’ 개발에 대한고찰. 교육평가연구, 11(1), 47-73.
  4. 김지혜 (2018). 2015 개정 초등 음악과 교육과정의 교과 역량 구현을 위한 성취기준 개선 방향, 석사학위논문, 서울대학교 대학원.
  5. 김향정 (2003). 음악 교육의 정의적 영역에 관한 개념적 정의와 연구 방법의 이론적 고찰, 음악과 민족, 25, 363-382.
  6. 박지현, 양소영 (2018). 2015개정 음악과 교육과정의 교과 역량 함양을 위한 교과서 모형 개발. 음악교육연구, 47(1), 105-125.
  7. 백남진 (2014a). 교과 교육과정 성취기준 진술의 개선 방향 탐색: 한국과 미국 과학 교육과정 검토를 중심으로, 교육과정연구, 32(2), 101-131.
  8. 백남진 (2014b). 교과 특수 역량에 기반한 성취기준 개발의 방향 탐색: 호주, 캐나다, 싱가포르 사회과 교육과정을 중심으로, 교육과정연구, 32(4), 163-194.
  9. 백남진, 온정덕 (2016). 역량 기반 교육과정의 이해와 설계. 서울: 교육아카데미.
  10. 백순근, 소경희, 김광주, 조난심 (1998). 국가 교육과정에 근거한 평가 기준 및 도구 개발 연구(총론). 연구보고 RRE 98-3-1. 서울: 한국교육과정평가원.
  11. 소경희 (2007). 학교교육의 맥락에서 본 ‘역량(competency)’의 의미와 교육과정적함의, 교육과정연구, 25(3), 1-21.
  12. 윤현진, 박선화, 이근호 (2008). 교육과정에서의 성취기준 연구, 연구보고 RRC 2008-2. 서울: 한국교육과정평가원.
  13. 이병기 (2010). 교육목표분류학에 의한 정보 활용 과정 모형의 재구조화에 관한연구, 한국도서관정보학회, 41(2), 107-126.
  14. 진미석 (2016). 핵심역량은 교육의 오래된 질문에 대한 새로운 해답이 될 수 있는가?. 핵심역량교육연구, 1(1), 1-14.
  15. 한혜정, 김기철, 이주연, 장경숙 (2018). 역량기반 교육과정에 대한 국내 선행연구의 이론적 논의 분석 및 쟁점 탐색, 교육과정평가연구, 21(3), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.29221/jce.2018.21.3.1 [Crossref]
  16. ACARA (2011). General Capabilities Consultation Report. Sydney: Australian curriculum assessment and reporting authority.
  17. Bloom, B. S. (1956). The Classification of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain. Washington, D. C.: Gryphon House.
  18. European Communities (2005). Proposal for a Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council on key competences for lifelong learning, Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
  19. Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212-218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2 [Crossref]
  20. McClelland (1973). Testing for Competence Rather Than for “Intelligence”. American Psychologist, 28(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034092 [Crossref]
  21. P21 (2015). P21 Framework Definitions. Washington: The Partnership for 21st Century Learning.

Archives

(53 Volumes, 814 Articles)
view all volumes and issues

Author Fee

Review Fee: 90,000 won

Publication Fee: 200,000 won (+ 10,000 won, when exceeding 20 pages)

Bank Account: Post Office 101220-02-048775 (KMES, Daneun Kwon)