Articles

An Analysis of Arts Curriculum of High Schools in Seoul

AUTHOR :
Su-Young Bae
INFORMATION:
page. 37~59 / 2019 Vol.48 No.2
e-ISSN 2713-3788
p-ISSN 1229-4179
Received 2019-02-28
Revised 2019-04-19
Accepted 2019-05-03
DOI https://doi.org/10.30775/KMES.48.2.37

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study is to analyze the arts curriculum of high schools in Seoul. Of 188 general high schools, 157 schools, which publically announced the three-year curriculum of 2018 class, were selected. The status of arts curriculum by grade, the number of units of arts curriculum by school, and the opening of arts subjects were analyzed. The results were as follows: There are 78 schools (49.6%) in which the arts curriculum is organized in the first, second, and third grades, and 79 (51.4%) are organized in only one grade or two grades. 49 out of 157 schools (31.2%) organized arts subjects designated by school. Among 108 schools where students are allowed to choose arts subjects, 41 schools (26.1%) fixed the arts credits that students can take. Therefore, of 157 schools, 90 schools have limitation for students in selecting the arts subjects.

Keyword :

REFERENCES


  1. 교육부 (2015). 초·중등학교 교육과정 총론 (교육부 고시 제 2015-80호[별책1]).
  2. 교육과정평가원 (2015). 2015 개정 교육과정 총론 해설서 (중·고등학교) 개발 연구(연구보고 CRC 2015-28).
  3. 김대현 (2017). 교육과정의 이해. 서울: 학지사.
  4. 민용성·백경선·한혜정·곽상훈·정치훈(2011). 2009 개정 교육과정에 따른 고등학교 교육과정의 편성·운영 방안. 서울: 한국교육과정평가원.
  5. 박창언 (2017). 현대교육과정학, 서울: 학지사.
  6. 김지혜 (2019). 2015 개정 음악과 교육과정의 성취기준에 반영된 음악 교과 역량 분석. 음악교육연구, 48(1), 33-51.
  7. 소경희 (2015). 2015 개정 교육과정 총론 개정안이 남긴 과제: 각론 개발의 쟁점 탐색. 교육과정연구, 33(1), 195-214.
  8. 소경희 (2017). 교육과정의 이해. 서울: 교육과학사.
  9. 허계경, 정슬기 (2018). 현대교육과정의 이해. 경기: 문음사.
  10. 홍원표 (2016). 2015 개정 고등학교 교육과정의 적용 방안과 후속 지원에 대한 탐색적 연구. 교육과정연구, 34(2), 69-94.
  11. Brady, L. (1995). School based curriculum development and the national curriculum:Can they coexist?, Curriculum and Teaching, 10(1), 47-54. https://doi.org/10.7459/ct/10.1.06 [Crossref]
  12. Eisner, E. W. (1985). The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs. NY: Macmillan.
  13. Tyler, R. W. (2013). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226086644.001.0001 [Crossref]
  14. ㈜두산 (2018). 두산백과. 접속일 11.27.2018. http://www.doopedia.co.kr
  15. 한국교육학술정보원 (2018). 학교알리미. 접속일 10.20.2018.https://www.schoolinfo.go.kr
  16. 한국학중앙연구원 (2018). 한국민족문화대백과. 접속일 11.29.2018.http://encyk orea.aks.ac.kr

Archives

(53 Volumes, 814 Articles)
view all volumes and issues

Author Fee

Review Fee: 90,000 won

Publication Fee: 200,000 won (+ 10,000 won, when exceeding 20 pages)

Bank Account: Post Office 101220-02-048775 (KMES, Daneun Kwon)