Articles

Analyzing the Aesthetic Experience of College Students in Music Listening through the Affect-Space Framework

AUTHOR :
Su-Young Bae
INFORMATION:
page. 67~88 / 2023 Vol.52 No.4
e-ISSN 2713-3788
p-ISSN 1229-4179

ABSTRACT

The study aimed to explore the diversity of emotional and affective responses experienced by college students during music listening, based on the ‘affect-space framework’ (ASF) proposed by Schubert, North, and Hargreaves (2016). Three classical pieces representing various periods and styles were selected for the survey of 84 college students. The results are as follows. First, the pieces evoked profound affections and simultaneously contrasting emotions in college students, revealing the multilayered and complex nature of music perception. Second, when applying the ASF, noticeable gender differences were observed in the aesthetic experiences and judgments of various musical works. Third, participants’ prior music education levels significantly influenced their aesthetic experience and artistic judgments of the pieces. Fourth, no clear correlation was found between the familiarity of the pieces and the aesthetic experience. These findings suggest that various factors can influence college students’ music listening experiences and underscore the need for more detailed research.

Keyword :

REFERENCES


  1. Augustin, M. D., Wagemans, J., & Carbon, C. C. (2012). All is beautiful? Generality vs. specificity of word usage in visual aesthetics. Acta Psychologica, 139(1), 187-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.10.004 [Crossref] [Pubmed]
  2. Bae, S. Y. (2021). Application and effects of music appreciation model for emotional development. korean Journal of Research in Music Education, 50(2), 69-88. https://doi.org/10.30775/KMES.50.2.69 [Crossref]
  3. Bernard, Y. (1972). Sex influence in aesthetic behavior. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 34(2), 663-666. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1972.34.2.663 [Crossref]
  4. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1991). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper Perennial.
  5. Gabrielsson, A. (2001). Emotion perceived and emotion felt: Same or different? Musicae Scientiae, 5(1_suppl), 123-147. https://doi.org/10.1177/10298649020050S105 [Crossref]
  6. Hanich, J., Wagner, V., Shah, M., Jacobsen, T., & Menninghaus, W. (2014). Why we like to watch sad films. The pleasure of being moved in aesthetic experiences. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(2), 130-143. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035690 [Crossref]
  7. Hargreaves, D. J., & North, A. C. (2010). Experimental aesthetics and liking for music. In P. N. Juslin & J. A. Sloboda (Eds.), Handbook of music and emotion: Theory, research, applications (pp. 515-546). New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230143.003.0019 [Crossref]
  8. Hodges, D. A. (2014). The neuroaesthetics of music. In S. Hallam, I. Cross, & M. Thaut (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of music psychology (pp. 237-258). New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198722946.013.20 [Crossref]
  9. Huron, D. (2014). Aesthetics. In S. Hallam, I. Cross, & M. Thaut (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of music psychology (pp. 233-245). New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198722946.013.19 [Crossref]
  10. Jacobsen, T. (2006). Bridging the arts and sciences: A framework for the psychology of aesthetics. Leonardo, 39, 155-162. https://doi.org/10.1162/leon.2006.39.2.155 [Crossref]
  11. Jacobsen, T. (2010). Beauty and the brain: Culture, history and individual differences in aesthetic appreciation. Journal of Anatomy, 216, 184-191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2009.01164.x [Crossref] [Pubmed]
  12. Jacobsen, T. (2016). Bridging the arts and sciences: A framework for the psychology of aesthetics. Leonardo, 39, 155-162. https://doi.org/10.1162/leon.2006.39.2.155 [Crossref]
  13. Jacobsen, T., Buchta, K., Köhler, M., & Schröger, E. (2004). The primacy of beauty in judging the aesthetics of objects. Psychological Reports, 94, 1253-1260. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.94.3c.1253-1260 [Crossref] [Pubmed]
  14. Ju, D. C. (2014). A critical overview on music education as aesthetic education in light of the original intention of the aesthetic philosophy. korean Journal of Research in Music Education, 43(2), 93-113.
  15. Juslin, P. N., & Laukka, P. (2004). Expression, perception, and induction of musical emotions: A review and a questionnaire study of everyday listening. Journal of New Music Research, 33(3), 217-238. https://doi.org/10.1080/0929821042000317813 [Crossref]
  16. Juslin, P. N., & Västfjäll, D. (2008). Emotional responses to music: The need to consider underlying mechanisms. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31(5), 559-575. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X08005293 [Crossref] [Pubmed]
  17. Kim, G. S. (2008). The expression of singing as aesthetic experience of the lyrics. korean Journal of Research in Music Education, 34, 1-23.
  18. Kirsch, L. P., Urgesi, C., & Cross, E. S. (2016). Shaping and reshaping the aesthetic brain: Emerging perspectives on the neurobiology of embodied aesthetics. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 62, 56-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.12.005 [Crossref] [Pubmed]
  19. Koelsch, S. (2014). Brain correlates of music-evoked emotions. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15(3), 170-180. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3666 [Crossref] [Pubmed]
  20. Kuehnast, M., Wagner, V., Wassiliwizky, E., Jacobsen, T., & Menninghaus, W. (2014). Being moved: Linguistic representation and conceptual structure. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(1242), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01242 [Crossref] [Pubmed]
  21. Leder, H., & Nadal, M. (2014). Ten years of a model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments: The aesthetic episode-Developments and challenges in empirical aesthetics. British Journal of Psychology, 105, 443-464. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12084 [Crossref] [Pubmed]
  22. Levitin, D. J. (2006). This is your brain on music: The science of a human obsession. Dutton/Penguin Books.
  23. Markovic, S. (2012). Components of aesthetic experience: aesthetic fascination, aesthetic appraisal, and aesthetic emotion. I-Perception, 3(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1068/i0450aap [Crossref] [Pubmed]
  24. Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1954.tb01136.x [Crossref] [Pubmed]
  25. Menninghaus, W., Wagner, V., Hanich, J., Wassiliwizky, E., Jacobsen, T., & Koelsch, S. (2017). The distancing-embracing model of the enjoyment of negative emotions in art reception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, e347. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17000309 [Crossref] [Pubmed]
  26. Menninghaus, W., Wagner, V., Hanich, J., Wassiliwizky, E., Kuehnast, M., & Jacobsen, T. (2015). Towards a psychological construct of being moved. PLoS ONE, 10, e0128451. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128451 [Crossref] [Pubmed]
  27. Pearce, M. T., Zaidel, D. W., Vartanian, O., Skov, M., Leder, H., Chatterjee, A., & Nadal, M. (2016). Neuroaesthetics: The cognitive neuroscience of aesthetic experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 265-279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615621274 [Crossref] [Pubmed]
  28. Pulzella, D. J. (2000). Differences in reactions to paintings by male and female college students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 91(1), 251-258. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.2000.91.1.251 [Crossref] [Pubmed]
  29. Schubert, E. (1996). Enjoyment of negative emotions in music: An associative network explanation. Psychology of Music, 24, 18-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735696241003 [Crossref]
  30. Schubert, E. (2013). Loved music can make a listener feel negative emotions. Musicae Scientiae, 17, 11-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864912461321 [Crossref]
  31. Schubert, E., North, A., & Hargreaves, D. (2016). Aesthetic experience explained by the affect-space framework. Empirical Musicology Review, 11(3-4), 330. https://doi.org/10.18061/emr.v11i3-4.5115 [Crossref]
  32. Schubert, E., North, A., & Hargreaves, D. (2020). Empirical test of aesthetic experience using the affect-space framework. Psychomusicology: Music, Mind, and Brain, 30(1), 28-36. https://doi.org/10.1037/pmu0000248 [Crossref]
  33. Salkind, L., & Salkind, N. J. (1997). Gender and age differences in preference for works of art. Studies in Art Education, 38(4), 246-256. https://doi.org/10.2307/1320524 [Crossref]
  34. Sloboda, J. A. (1992). Empirical studies of emotional response to music. In M. Riess-Jones & S. Holleran (Eds.), Cognitive bases of musical communication (pp. 33-46). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10104-003 [Crossref]
  35. Verhaeghen, P. (2018). Once more, with feeling: The role of familiarity in the aesthetic response. The Psychological Record, 68, 379-384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-018-0312-1 [Crossref]
  36. Zillmann, D., & Gan, S. (1997). Musical taste in adolescence. In D. J. Hargreaves, & A. C. North (Ed.), The social psychology of music (pp. 161-187). New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198523840.003.0009 [Crossref]

Archives

(53 Volumes, 814 Articles)
view all volumes and issues

Author Fee

Review Fee: 90,000 won

Publication Fee: 200,000 won (+ 10,000 won, when exceeding 20 pages)

Bank Account: Post Office 101220-02-048775 (KMES, Daneun Kwon)