ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study is to examine AI-based music through the lens of Heidegger's ontology, and to seek the direction of music education through this. Heidegger posited that humans can reveal the existence of (non)humans through questioning and thought about existence, and that humans can also become existence-in- the-world through uncovering the existence of non-humans. This suggests a potential coexistence between AI and humans. Therefore, Heidegger's ontology allows us to explore how humans can reveal the existence of music in encounters with AI music, and how humans can become beings(Dasein) through this. To this end, music education must first start with the use of AI and expand its use to various tools included in music. Second, it must be able to ask questions about music and connect and expand knowledge centered on music. Third, AI-generated music and learners must co-exist. Finally, AI and humans should lead the transformative development of art together.

Keyword :

REFERENCES

1. Ahn, C. W. (2022). Music composition using AI. In D. W. Shin (Ed.), AI in music and posthuman aesthetics (pp. 85-114). Seoul: Monopoly.
2. Anantrasirichai, N., & Bull, D. (2022). Artificial intelligence in the creative industries: A review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 55, 589-656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-021-10039-7 [Crossref]
3. BBC News (2018). Portrait by AI program sells for $432,000. Retrieved June 10, 2023, from https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-45980863
4. Bender, E. M., & Koller, A. (2020). Climbing towards NLU: On meaning, form, and understanding in the age of data. Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 5185-5198. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.463 [Crossref]
5. Boden, M. A. (1994). What is creativity? In M. A. Boden (Ed.), Dimenions of creativity (pp. 75-117). Cambridge: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2437.003.0006 [Crossref]
6. Bowman, W. (2018). The social and ethical significance of music and music education. Revista da ABEM, 26(40), 167-175. https://doi.org/10.33054/ABEM2018a4010 [Crossref]
7. Braidotti, R. (2013). Posthuman humanities. European Educational Research Journal, 12(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2013.12.1.1 [Crossref]
8. Britannica (2023). Creativity. Britannica. Retrieved July 23, 2023, from https://www.britannica.com/topic/creativity
9. Carnovalini, F., & Roda, A. (2020). Computational creativity and music generation systems: An introduction to the state of the art. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 3, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2020.00014 [Crossref] [Pubmed]
10. Cambridge (2023). Creativity. Cambridge Dictionary. Retrieved July 23, 2023, from https://dict ionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/creativity
11. Chang, J. H. (2023). The existence of our age seen with Heidegger's 'Being and Time'. Ajunews. Retrieved July 15, 2023, from https://www.ajunews.com/view/20230614075741397
12. Choi, E. (2023). Exploring the direction of music education from the perspective of posthumanism. Journal of Music Education Science, 54, 145-161. https://doi.org/10.30832/JMES.2023.54.145 [Crossref]
13. Choi, J. K. (2021). Tasks of music education for post-digital era: Focusing on philosophical considerations about technology and art. Korean Journal of Research in MusicEducation, 50(4), 175-197. https://doi.org/10.30775/KMES.50.4.175 [Crossref]
14. Choi, Y. H. (2015). A study of the intellectual and poetic qualities of musical works: Based on the Dasein analytics and art theory by Martin Heidegger. Master diss., Seoul National University of Aesthetics.
15. Chung, N. R. (2006). The genealogy of the subject: Nietzsche's criticism of the concept of the subject. Philosophical Studies, 98, 269-294.
16. Coeckelbergh, M. (2017). Can machines create art? Philosophy & Technology, 30(3), 285-303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-016-0231-5 [Crossref]
17. Coscarelli, J. (2023). An A.I. hit of fake 'Drake' and 'The weeknd' rattles the music world. NY Times. Retrieved June 15, 2023, from https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/19/arts/music/ai-drake-the-weeknd-fake.html
18. Descartes, R. (2004). A discourse on method: Meditations and principles. Trans. John, V. London: Orion Publishing Group.
19. Gartner (2021). Gartner identifies the top strategic technology trends for 2022. Gartner. Retrieved May 13, 2023, from https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2021-10-18-gartner-identifies-the-top-strategic-technology-trends-for-2022
20. Haraway, D. (2004). Ecce homo, ain't(ar'n't) I a woman and inappropriate/d others: The human in a post-human landscape. In D. Haraway (Ed.), The Haraway reader (pp.47-62). New York & London: Routledge.
21. Heidegger, M. (1977a). Martin Heidegger in conversation. In R. Wisser (Ed.). India: ArnoldHeinemann Publishers.
22. Heidegger, M. (1977b). The question concerning technology. Trans. L. William. In The question concerning technology and other essays(pp. 3-35). New York: Harper &Row.
23. Heidegger, M. (1994). Introduction to metaphysics. Trans. H. K. Park. Seoul: Moonye.
24. Heidegger, M. (1998). Sein und zeit. Trans. K. S. Lee. Seoul: Kachibooks.
25. Heidegger, M. (2008). Holzwege. Trans. S. H. Shin. Seoul: Nanam.
26. Holland, S. (2020). Artificial intelligence in music education: A critical review. In Miranda. E. R. (Ed.). Readings in music and artificial intelligence (pp. 239-274). New York: Routledge.
27. Jocoding (2023). AI clone singer. Youthbe. Retrieved June 10, 2023, from https://www.youtub e.com/watch?v=e7rz45NmOT8&t=218s
28. Jo, H. J. (2018). The "sense" of the time in Heidegger's artistic theory: Focusing on Being and Time, "Time and Being" and "The origin of the work of art". Researches in Contemporary European Philosophy, 50, 31-63.
29. Kang, H. S. (2021). The deliberative thought of Heiddegger. Paju: Acanet.
30. Ko, I. S. (2018). Can artificial intelligence be an autonomous entity? In J. W. Lee (Ed.), Ontology of artifical intelligence (pp. 83-116). Paju: Hanul Books.
31. Kwak, D. J. (2022). Exploring the history of AI-based music education and its value in music education. In D. W. Shin (Ed.), AI in music and posthuman aesthetics (pp.117-155). Seoul: Monopoly.
32. Lee, J. W. (2018). AI and relational autonomy. In J. W. Lee. (Ed.), Ontology of artifical intelligence (pp. 119-136). Paju: Hanul Books.
33. Lee, S. J., & Park, C. K. (1999). Heidegger: His life and thoughts. Seoul: SNU Press.
34. Lee, D. W. (2022). Donwoong Lee's music playing robot and AI. In D. W. Shin (Ed.), AI in music and posthuman aesthetics (pp. 59-84). Seoul: Monopoly.
35. Lovelace, A. A. (1843). Notes on Menabrea's sketch of the analytical engine invented by Charles Babbage. Taylor's Scientific Memoirs, 3, 666-731.
36. Magenta (2016). Make music and art using machine learning. Retrieved June 12, 2023, from https://magenta.tensorflow.org/
37. Mazzone, M., & Elgammal, A. (2019). Art, creativity, and the potential of artificial intelligence. In Arts, 8(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts8010026 [Crossref]
38. Naver (2023). Natural language. Naver encyclopedia of knowledge. Retieved July 10, 2023, from https://terms.naver.com/entry.naver?docId=856923&cid=50376&categoryId=50376
39. Oh, H. S. (2022). The aesthetics of musical posthumanism in AI-created music. In D. W. Shin (Ed.), AI in music and posthuman aesthetics (pp. 159-194). Seoul: Monopoly.
40. Oh, J. H., Jeong, J. E., & Seog, M. J. (2014). Technology competencies in 21st-century music education. korean Journal of Research in Music Education, 43(4), 187-209.
41. Park, C. K. (2020). A close reading of Heidegger's being and time. Seoul: Greenbee.
42. Park, E. (2017). An analysis of melody composition process and product by different music making tools. korean Journal of Research in Music Education, 46(1), 67-87. https://doi.org/10.30775/KMES.46.1.04 [Crossref]
43. Park, I. J. (2017). A study on the meaning of Heidegger's being through critical review of Descartes' ontology. Deadong Chulhak, 78, 71-93. https://doi.org/10.20539/deadong.2017.78.04 [Crossref]
44. Park, Y. J. (2015). Heidegger's aesthetics: Art as ontology. Philosophy and Phenomenological Studies, 66, 27-51.
45. Peterson, J. B. & Roemmele. B. (2023). Chat GPT and the dawn of computerized hyperIntelligence. Retrieved June 13, 2023, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_E4t7tWHUY&t=2s
46. Plato (2005). Politeia. Trans. J. H. Park. Paju: Seokwangsa.
47. Poggeler, O. (1993). The paths of Heidegger's life and thought. Trans. K. S. Lee & M. S. Lee. Seoul: Moonye.
48. Roose, K. (2022). An A.I.-generated picture won an art prize. Artists aren't happy. NY Times. Retrieved June 6, 2023, from https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/02/technology/ai-artificial-intelligence-artists.html
49. Searle, J. R. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(3), 417-424. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005756 [Crossref]
50. Seo, Y. S. (2013). Theory of being and theory of education in Heidegger. The Journal of Moral Education, 25(2), 57-86. https://doi.org/10.17715/jme.2013.08.25.2.57 [Crossref]
51. Skillicorn, N. (2022). Artist wins art fair using painting created using A.I. image generator. Retrieved June 14, 2023, from https://www.ideatovalue.com/crea/nickskillicorn/2022/09/artist-wins-art-fair-using-painting-created-using-a-i-image-generator/
52. Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59(236), 433-460. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433 [Crossref]
53. Webster, P. R. (2002). Creative thinking in music: Advancing a model. In T. Sullivan & L. Willingham (Eds.), Creativity and music education (pp. 16-34). Toronto: Britannia Printers.
54. Wiggins, G. A. (2006). Searching for computational creativity. New Generation Computing, 24, 209-222. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03037332 [Crossref]
55. Zulic, H. (2019). How AI can change/improve/influence music composition, performance and education: Three case studies. INSAM Journal of Contemporary Music, Art and Technology, 1(2), 100-114. https://doi.org/10.51191/issn.2637-1898.2019.2.2.100 [Crossref]