ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study is to explore and analyze the arts curriculum framework, including music subjects, in India's newly announced 'National Curriculum Framework for School Education 2023', in order to examine various implications for Korea's music curriculum. For this purpose, this paper utilizes a literature research method to examine India’s curriculum documents, focusing on items such as 'document structure', 'competency', 'rationale and aims', 'content system and achievement standards' and ‘teaching & learning and assessment’ according to the components of Korea's 2022 revised music curriculum. As a result of the analysis, the characteristics of each item and the differences with Korea's 2022 revised music curriculum were presented, and based on this, implications related to the design method and content of Korea's music curriculum were derived.

Keyword :

REFERENCES

1. Britannica, T. (2011, April 12). Natyashastra. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved October 7, 2023, from https://www.britannica.com/topic/Natyashastra
2. Jang, G. J. (2015). A comparison of the relationship between French and German music textbooks and curriculum. Journal of Music Education Science, 23, 261-283.
3. Ju, D. C. (2019). Structural characteristics of recent German curricula for music class. Korean Journal of Research in Music Education, 48(4), 223-251. https://doi.org/10.30775/KMES.48.4.223 [Crossref]
4. Kim, E. J. (2015). An analysis of revised 2015 music curriculum(GMP) in Singapore. Korean Journal of Research in Music Education, 44(3), 1-22.
5. Kim, J. M., & Lee, W. G. (2014). A study on India's CMC(Computer Masti Curriculum) based on Bruner's educational theories. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 17(6), 59-69.
6. Kim, S. Y., & So, K. H. (2021). Exploring the way of designing the content system for the competency-based music curriculum: In comparison with the music curriculum in British Columbia, Canada. Korean Journal of Research in Music Education, 50(2), 39-68. https://doi.org/10.31177/SSKME.2020.14.2.02 [Crossref]
7. Ko, E. J. (2023). A comparative analysis of music curriculum in Korea and Australia: Focusing on the 2022 revised curriculum. Korean Journal of Research in Music Education, 52(3), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.30775/KMES.52.3.01 [Crossref]
8. Lee, K. E. (2019). International comparison on the presentation methods of competences in the music curriculum - With a focus on South Korea, France, Finland, and Australia -. Korean Journal of Research in Music Education, 48(2), 61-84. https://doi.org/10.30775/KMES.48.2.61 [Crossref]
9. Ministry of Education (2022). Music curriculum. No. 2022-33. [Supplementary 12]. Sejong: Author.
10. Ministry of Human Resource Development (2020). National education policy 2020. Retrieved September 6, 2023, from https://www.education.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/NEP_Final_English_0.pdf
11. NCERT (2023). National curriculum framework for school education 2023. Retrieved September 6, 2023, from https://ncf.ncert.gov.in/#/web/documents
12. Park, J. H., & Kim, J. H. (2021). Comparative analysis of music curriculum: Focusing on USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Singapore, Germany, France, and Finland. Korean Journal of Research in Music Education, 50(4), 71-92. https://doi.org/10.30775/KMES.50.4.71 [Crossref]
13. Park, K. M. (2005). A comparative study of mathematics curriculum in Singapore and India to search for the implication for the curriculum revision in Korea. The Mathematical Education, 44(4), 497-508.
14. Xu, Y. C., & Min, K. H. (2023). Exploration of trends in music education in China according to the study on changes in music education and of '2022 arts curriculum'. Korean Journal of Research in Music Education, 52(2), 191-208. https://doi.org/10.30775/KMES.52.2.191 [Crossref]
15. Yang, J. M. (2017). International comparisons of core competence and musical competence: Korea, Japan, Singapore, the United Kingdom, and USA. Korean Journal of Research in Music Education, 46(4), 77-103. https://doi.org/10.30775/KMES.46.4.04 [Crossref]