Articles

A Study on the Development and Effectiveness of a Strategic Model for Middle School Creative Classes Utilizing Generative AI Platforms

AUTHOR :
Younghoo Kim
INFORMATION:
page. 1~22 / 2024 Vol.53 No.3
e-ISSN 2713-3788
p-ISSN 1229-4179

ABSTRACT

This study aims to develop and validate the effectiveness of the “B.E.A.T.S.” program, a creative lesson strategy model designed for middle school students by leveraging generative AI-based platforms. The research was conducted over five instructional sessions involving 122 second-year students at Y Middle School in Seoul. The program incorporated a range of activities, including music composition using AI-driven music generation tools, along with prompt-based guidance to facilitate the creative process. Data were meticulously collected through a variety of methods, including surveys, student reflection journals, portfolios, and expert interviews, to provide a comprehensive analysis of students' attitudes toward AI, their interest in music, and their self-efficacy in creative tasks. The findings revealed that students experienced a significant increase in both interest and confidence in music creation when collaborating with AI. Additionally, there was a marked improvement in their critical thinking and problem-solving skills. However, the study also identified certain challenges, such as students developing an overreliance on AI technology and encountering difficulties in mastering basic composition skills. This research underscores the educational potential of integrating generative AI technology into creative lessons, while also addressing the challenges and proposing future strategies and educational approaches to enhance the learning experience.

Keyword :

REFERENCES


  1. Bae, S. A. (2000). The relationship between musical aptitude, interest in music, and music achievement. Unpublished master's thesis, Graduate School of Education, Chung-Ang University.
  2. Casini, L., Marfia, G., & Roccetti, M. (2018). Some reflections on the potential and limitations of deep learning for automated music generation. In 2018 IEEE 29th annual international symposium on personal, indoor and mobile radio communications (PIMRC) (pp. 27-31). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/PIMRC.2018.8581038 [Crossref]
  3. Choi, Y. I. (2024, April 18). Poza Labs launches official service of AI music creation platform 'LAIVE'... ""Will compete with SunoAI"". Startup News. Retrieved July 8, 2024, from https://www.etnews.com/20240418000299
  4. Choi, Y. K. (2008). A study on the impact of children's musical theater activities on children's interest and attitude toward music. Early Childhood Education Research & Review, 12(4), 89-109.
  5. Cole, R. (2020). The problem with AI music: Song and cyborg creativity in the digital age. Popular Music, 39(2), 332-338. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261143020000161 [Crossref]
  6. De Prisco, R., Zaccagnino, G., & Zaccagnino, R. (2020). EvoComposer: An evolutionary algorithm for 4-voice music compositions. Evolutionary Computation, 28(3), 489-530. https://doi.org/10.1162/evco_a_00265 [Crossref]
  7. Hong, Y. J. (2024, April 5). Famous composer didn't know... AI-created song wins first place in competition. SBS News. Retrieved July 8, 2024, from https://news.sbs.co.kr/news/endPage.do?news_id=N1007601599
  8. Jones, T. S., & Richey, R. C. (2000). Rapid prototyping methodology in action: A developmental study. Development, 48, 63-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02313401 [Crossref]
  9. Jun, M. J., & Kim, J. (2021). A study on real-time algorithmic composition system using OpenAI Jukebox's VQ-VAE algorithm. Journal of Digital Contents Society, 22(3), 375-381. https://doi.org/10.9728/dcs.2021.22.3.375 [Crossref]
  10. Jung, J. W. (2007). Understanding 'self-regulated learning' elements in music learning process and its educational implications. Korean Journal of Research in Music Education, 32, 127-158.
  11. Kang, M. S., & Joo, J. W. (2020). A study on the creation of artworks by artificial intelligence (AI) in the era of the fourth industrial revolution: Focusing on the perceptions of artists. Journal of Digital Contents Society, 21(1), 121-130. https://doi.org/10.9728/dcs.2020.21.1.121 [Crossref]
  12. Kang, Y. G. (2021). A study on the development of music arrangement educational content using artificial intelligence. Culture and Convergence, 43(2), 275-296. https://doi.org/10.33645/cnc.2021.02.43.2.275 [Crossref]
  13. Kim, S. W., & Lee, Y. J. (2020). Development of an attitude measurement tool towards artificial intelligence for middle school students. Journal of the Korean Association of Computer Education, 23(3), 17-30.
  14. Kim, S. Y., & Kim, H. T. (2022). Artificial intelligence (AI) composition technology trends & creation platform. The Korean Society of Culture and Convergence, 44(6), 207-228. https://doi.org/10.33645/cnc.2022.6.44.6.207 [Crossref]
  15. Kim, S., J. (2021). The effect of the middle school free semester music program on students' interest in music and self-efficacy. Master's thesis, Graduate School of Education, Dong-A University, Busan, South Korea.
  16. Kim, Y. H., & Min, K. H. (2022). Development and effect of AI-based smart hip-hop music maker (Maker) class program (STARS). The Korean Society for Culture and Arts Education Studies, 17(6), 205-232.
  17. Kim, Y., & Jang, M. H. (2023). A study on improving musical expression through the optimization of artificial neural network model structure. Journal of Cultural Industry Studies, 23(3), 35-45. https://doi.org/10.35174/JKCI.2023.09.23.3.35 [Crossref]
  18. Lee, B. R., & Shin, G. H. (2023). A study on teaching and learning methods for secondary music creation projects using artificial intelligence (AI). Journal of Music Education Science, (55), 63-82. https://doi.org/10.30832/JMES.2023.55.63 [Crossref]
  19. Lee, D. H., & An, S. Y. (2023). Effectiveness analysis of practical music composition education using generative AI. Journal of Convergence Science, Technology, and Society, 2(2), 17-22. https://doi.org/10.56366/jcsts.2023.2.2.17 [Crossref]
  20. Lee, H. J. (2023). The issue of expansibility in AI composition: Changes in work structure due to sequence length limitations of LSTM and transformer. Music and Critic, 15, 49-59.
  21. Lee, H. S., & Roh, K. W. (2024). Teaching and learning methods for secondary blended learning music creation using AI magenta studio. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 24(7), 217-232. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2024.24.7.217 [Crossref]
  22. McPherson, G. E., & McCormick, J. (2006). Self-efficacy and music performance. Psychology of Music, 34(3), 322-336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735606064841 [Crossref]
  23. Moon, H. J., & Seung, Y. H. (2022). Understanding AI and studying examples and utilization methods of AI-based music tools. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 22(4), 341-358. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2022.22.4.341 [Crossref]
  24. Oh, H. S. (2012). The effect of Korean music class applying integrated music learning (CMLS) on music self-efficacy. Master thesis, Gyeongin National University of Education.
  25. Park, E. B., & Yang, J. M. (2023). Directions for music creation education following the development of AI music generators. Journal of Music Education Science, (56), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.30832/JMES.2023.56.1 [Crossref]
  26. Park, E. B., & Yang, J. M. (2024). Analysis of musical works of AI music generator and implications for music education. Korean Journal of Research in Music Education, 53(1), 75-100. https://doi.org/10.30775/KMES.53.1.75 [Crossref]
  27. Park, H., & Nam, S. (2023). Development of an EduTech elementary music creation program applying the ASSURE model. Journal of Music Education Science, (55), 33-62. https://doi.org/10.30832/JMES.2023.55.33 [Crossref]
  28. Yoon, K. G. (2021). A study on the guidance of music subject creation classes using artificial intelligence (AI). Education Research, 80, 369-385.
  29. Yoon, K. G. (2024). Design of music creation guidance applying generative AI 'text to music' in the group inquiry model. Korean Journal of Research in Music Education, 53(1), 143-164. https://doi.org/10.30775/KMES.53.1.143 [Crossref]

Archives

(54 Volumes, 877 Articles)
view all volumes and issues

Author Fee

Review Fee: $80

Publication Fee: $145(~$7, when exceeding 20 pages)

Bank Account: https://www.paypal.me/kmes727